Advanced Architectures: Multi-vector and Temporal Search
NeuronDB Team
2/24/2025
30 min read
Advanced Architectures Overview
Advanced architectures handle complex requirements. They use multi-vector embeddings. They support temporal search. They employ ensemble methods. They optimize indexing strategies.
Advanced architectures improve performance. They handle complexity. They enable sophisticated applications. They optimize for scale.
Multi-vector embeddings use multiple vectors per document. They capture different aspects. They improve retrieval coverage. They handle complex documents.
Methods include sentence-level, chunk-level, and aspect-based embeddings. Each captures different information. Combined they improve retrieval.
Multi-vector embeddings improve coverage. They capture document complexity. They enable better retrieval.
Temporal Search Patterns
Temporal search handles time-sensitive information. It considers document timestamps. It prioritizes recent information. It enables time-based queries.
Patterns include recency boosting, time-weighted scoring, and temporal filtering. Each handles time differently. Combined they improve temporal relevance.
Temporal search handles time-sensitive queries. It prioritizes recent information. It improves temporal relevance.
Ensemble Methods
Ensemble methods combine multiple models. They improve performance. They reduce variance. They increase robustness.
Methods include voting, averaging, and stacking. Voting combines predictions. Averaging combines probabilities. Stacking uses meta-learner.
# Ensemble Methods
defensemble_predict(models, input_data):
predictions =[]
for model in models:
pred = model.predict(input_data)
predictions.append(pred)
# Voting
voted = majority_vote(predictions)
# Averaging
averaged = np.mean(predictions, axis=0)
# Stacking
stacked = meta_learner.predict(predictions)
return stacked
Ensemble methods improve performance. They combine model strengths. They reduce individual weaknesses.
Detailed Ensemble Techniques
Voting ensembles combine predictions from multiple models. Hard voting uses majority class. Soft voting averages probabilities. Voting works well when models are diverse. It reduces individual model errors.
Averaging ensembles average predictions. For regression, average numeric predictions. For classification, average probability distributions. Averaging reduces variance. It improves stability.
Stacking uses meta-learner. Base models make predictions. Meta-learner learns to combine predictions. It learns optimal combination. It often performs best. It requires more data.
# Detailed Ensemble Implementation
from sklearn.ensemble import VotingClassifier, VotingRegressor, StackingClassifier
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression, LinearRegression
Select diverse base models. Different algorithms learn different patterns. Different architectures capture different features. Diversity improves ensemble performance. Similar models provide little benefit.
Optimize ensemble size. More models improve performance but increase computation. Diminishing returns occur after certain point. Typical ensemble size is 5-20 models. Test different sizes to find optimal.
Weight ensemble members. Some models perform better. Assign higher weights to better models. Learn weights from validation data. Weighted combination improves performance.
# Ensemble Optimization
classEnsembleOptimizer:
def__init__(self):
self.model_weights =None
defoptimize_weights(self, models, X_val, y_val):
"""Optimize ensemble weights using validation data"""
from scipy.optimize import minimize
# Get predictions from all models
predictions =[]
for model in models:
ifhasattr(model,'predict_proba'):
pred = model.predict_proba(X_val)
else:
pred = model.predict(X_val)
predictions.append(pred)
predictions = np.array(predictions)
# Objective function: minimize error with weighted combination
Advanced indexing enables scale. It optimizes performance. It handles large datasets.
Complex Architecture Designs
Complex architectures combine multiple techniques. They optimize for specific requirements. They balance tradeoffs. They enable sophisticated applications.
Designs include multi-stage retrieval, cascading models, and adaptive systems. Each handles complexity differently. Combined they enable advanced applications.
Complex architectures enable advanced applications. They combine techniques effectively. They optimize for requirements.
Detailed Architecture Design Patterns
Multi-stage retrieval uses multiple retrieval passes. First stage uses fast approximate search. It retrieves large candidate set. Second stage uses accurate reranking. It selects final results. This balances speed and accuracy.
Cascading models use multiple models in sequence. Early models filter candidates quickly. Later models provide accurate predictions. Each model has different speed-accuracy tradeoff. This optimizes overall performance.
Adaptive systems adjust behavior dynamically. They monitor performance metrics. They switch strategies based on conditions. They optimize for current workload. They improve efficiency.
The diagram shows attention types. Self-attention connects all tokens. Cross-attention connects query and keys. Multi-head attention uses parallel heads. Each captures different relationships.
Detailed Attention Mechanism Mathematics
Self-attention computes attention(Q, K, V) = softmax(QKᵀ / √dₖ) V. Q, K, V are query, key, and value matrices. Each row represents a token position. QKᵀ computes similarity between all position pairs. Division by √dₖ prevents large values. Softmax converts to probabilities. V provides content to attend to.
Scaled dot-product attention uses dot products. It is computationally efficient. It works well in practice. It requires O(n²) computation for sequence length n. This limits maximum sequence length.
Attention weights show what each position attends to. They are interpretable. They reveal model focus. They help debug models. They enable visualization.
# Detailed Attention Mathematics
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
classAttentionMechanismDetailed:
def__init__(self, d_model, d_k=None, d_v=None):
self.d_model = d_model
self.d_k = d_k if d_k else d_model
self.d_v = d_v if d_v else d_model
self.W_q = nn.Linear(d_model, self.d_k)
self.W_k = nn.Linear(d_model, self.d_k)
self.W_v = nn.Linear(d_model, self.d_v)
defscaled_dot_product_attention(self, Q, K, V, mask=None):
print("Attention weights sum (should be 1): "+str(weights.sum(dim=-1)[0,0].item()))
Attention Variants and Optimizations
Sparse attention reduces computation. It attends to subset of positions. It uses patterns or learned sparsity. It scales to longer sequences. It maintains quality.
Linear attention uses kernel methods. It reduces complexity from O(n²) to O(n). It approximates softmax attention. It enables longer sequences. It trades some accuracy for speed.
Flash attention optimizes memory usage. It computes attention in blocks. It reduces memory from O(n²) to O(n). It speeds up training. It enables larger batch sizes.
Graph neural networks process graph-structured data. They handle nodes and edges. They capture relationships. They work for social networks and knowledge graphs.
The diagram shows graph structure. Nodes represent entities. Edges represent relationships. Networks process graph information. Enable relationship learning.
Detailed Graph Neural Network Implementation
Graph neural networks process graph-structured data. They aggregate neighbor information. They update node representations. They capture graph structure.
Message passing is core mechanism. Each node collects messages from neighbors. Messages contain neighbor features. Aggregation combines messages. Update function computes new node representation.
Graph Convolutional Networks use spectral graph theory. They filter signals on graphs. They work well for node classification. They scale to large graphs.
Graph Attention Networks use attention mechanisms. They learn importance of neighbors. They adapt to different graph structures. They improve performance on many tasks.
GraphSAGE samples and aggregates neighbors. It works for large graphs. It generalizes to unseen nodes. It enables inductive learning.
Diffusion models generate data through iterative denoising. Forward process adds noise. Reverse process removes noise. They generate high-quality images and audio.
The diagram shows diffusion process. Forward adds noise gradually. Reverse removes noise iteratively. Generates new samples. Works for images and audio.
Detailed Diffusion Model Implementation
Diffusion models learn to reverse noise process. Forward process adds Gaussian noise. q(x_t | x_{t-1}) = N(x_t; √(1-β_t)x_{t-1}, β_t I). β_t is noise schedule. It increases over time. Eventually data becomes pure noise.
Reverse process learns to denoise. p_θ(x_{t-1} | x_t) predicts previous step. Model learns to predict noise. It subtracts predicted noise. It recovers original data.
Training objective minimizes noise prediction error. L = E[||ε - ε_θ(x_t, t)||²]. ε is actual noise. ε_θ is predicted noise. Model learns to predict noise at each timestep.
Reinforcement learning learns from interaction. Agents take actions. Environments provide rewards. Policies improve over time. Enables game playing and robotics.
The diagram shows RL loop. Agent observes state. Agent takes action. Environment provides reward. Agent updates policy. Process repeats for learning.
Detailed Reinforcement Learning Algorithms
Q-learning learns action-value function. Q(s, a) estimates expected return. It uses Bellman equation. Q(s, a) = r + γ max Q(s', a'). It learns optimal policy. It works for discrete actions.
Policy gradient methods learn policy directly. They maximize expected return. They use gradient ascent. They work for continuous actions. They require more samples.
Actor-critic combines value and policy methods. Actor learns policy. Critic learns value function. Critic guides actor updates. It reduces variance. It improves learning.
Experience replay stores past experiences. It breaks correlation between samples. It improves sample efficiency. It enables off-policy learning. It requires memory buffer.
Target networks stabilize learning. Separate network for target values. Target network updates slowly. It reduces training instability. It improves convergence.